Dalal v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The degree of success a plaintiff enjoys is a critical factor in determining the amount of fees to be awarded.” (internal citations and quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dalal v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-06-29· cited 14×
• Dalal v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 1996-06-19· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hensley v. Eckerhart
  Supreme Court· 1983-05-16· cited 17,202×
• Farrar v. Hobby
  Supreme Court· 1992-12-14· cited 3,072×
• City of Riverside v. Rivera
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-27· cited 1,221×
• Marek v. Chesny
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 923×
• Frank L. SPULAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. K MART CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-01-18· cited 239×
• Jane L. v. Bangerter
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-08-02· cited 181×
• Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-05-30· cited 84×
• Donald K. Hall v. Western Production Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1993-03-16· cited 36×
• Gray v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1992-07-30· cited 36×
• Bruno v. Western Electric Co.
  D. Colorado· 1985-09-26· cited 14×
• Samir Dalal v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Doing Business as Metrum Information Storage and Honeywell Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-12-18· cited 8×
• Caruso v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1991-12-06· cited 8×