Dakota Systems, Inc. v. Viken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that sovereign immunity does not bar a declaratory judgment action against a state official
• finding that sovereign immunity does not bar a declaratory judgment action against a state official

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Benson v. State
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-01-24· cited 42×
• Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. Viken
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-11-02· cited 20×
• Sisney v. Reisch
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-07-23· cited 12×
• Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Daugaard
  D. South Dakota· 2011-06-30· cited 12×
• Clay v. Weber
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-05-02· cited 5×
• Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Kinsman
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-07-01· cited 3×
• THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT A
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-11-24· cited 2×
• Nelson v. Viken
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-11-02· cited 1×
• PLANNED PARENTHOOD MN, ND, SD v. Daugaard
  D. South Dakota· 2011-06-30
• Collector of Winchester, Missouri, and City of Winchester, Missouri v. Charter Communications, Inc., and Charter Communications, LLC, and Charter Fiberlink-Missouri, LLC, and Charter Advanced Services (MO), LLC
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-12-13

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 2,291×
• CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-21· cited 1,080×
• Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Mortier
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-21· cited 626×
• Sperry v. Florida Ex Rel. Florida Bar
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 362×
• Tucker v. Hinds County
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 235×
• Miller v. Egan
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-12· cited 220×
• Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-10-03· cited 155×
• Simpson v. Tobin
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-05-01· cited 102×
• City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 91×
• Northwall v. State, Dept. of Revenue
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2002-01-18· cited 88×
• White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. Gunderson
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1925-10-28· cited 86×
• Tcg Detroit, (98-2034), (98-2035) v. City of Dearborn, (98-2034),third-Party (98-2035), Ameritech Michigan, Incorporated, Third-Party (98-2035)
  Third Circuit· 2000-03-07· cited 76×
• Boe v. Foss
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1956-05-04· cited 65×
• The City of Rome, New York v. Verizon Communications Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2004-03-25· cited 60×
• Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. Meierhenry
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-03-28· cited 44×
• South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. Barnett
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 43×
• Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. v. Prince George's County
  D. Maryland· 1999-05-24· cited 43×
• Bell Atlantic Mobile, Inc. v. Department of Public Utility Control
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-06-13· cited 40×
• Wyatt v. Kundert
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-10-02· cited 34×
• At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of Eugene
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 30×