Dahl v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a sentence falls within the statutory limits, as in this case, we consider only whether the sentence was based on factual predicates that were false, impermissible, or lacked minimal reliability, or is indicative judicial vindictiveness, bias, or a closed mind.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Phillips
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2017-10-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Mayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-01-31· cited 158×
• Weston v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2003-09-30· cited 81×
• Dahl v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2007-05-15· cited 5×