Skip to main content

Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 136
  • 259 N.J. Super. 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rebuttable presumption exists that missing warning would have been heeded if provided
  • discussing decisions in several jurisdictions as early as 1985 allowing apportionment of fault to plaintiff smokers
  • discussing decisions in several jurisdictions as early as 1985 allowing apportionment of fault to plaintiff smokers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges King, Gruccio and Brochin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dafler v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.