Skip to main content
· 2/25/2010

Curtis & Windham Architects, Inc. v. Williams

Citations

  • 315 S.W.3d 102
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1411
  • 2010 WL 670584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims based on alleged overbilling did not implicate a professional engineer’s education, training, and experience in applying special knowledge or judgment
  • action for declaratory judgment did not require certificate of merit since it did not implicate a negligent act, error, or omission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Terry Jennings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.