· 10/14/2011
Carter & Burgess Inc. v. Yasameen Sardari
Citations
- 355 S.W.3d 804
- 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 8227
- 2011 WL 4925919
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because we nevertheless conclude that the action against C & B arose from its provision of professional services as an architectural firm, the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keyes, Higley, Massengale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.