Curtis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “or” and “and” are distinct terms, and “or” generally indicates the disjunctive
• providing that a person who displays signs of cognitive impairment but control of his physical movements is as much of a danger as a person who is unable to control his physical movements but has cognitive lucidity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miguel Gutierrez v. Michael Kermon
  Seventh Circuit· 2013-07-12· cited 92×
• Woodson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29· cited 31×
• Michael Woodson v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29
• Matthew R. Gouldsmith v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-26
• Candice Scarbrough v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-07-25
• Timothy Malott v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-05-19
• Bremni Onelio Villatoro v. AmGuard Insurance Company
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2025-08-21