Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 2/7/1990

Waldorf v. Shuta

Citations

  • 896 F.2d 723
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was an error for Waldorf to have presented testimony about future earnings based on attorney's salary
  • holding that it was an error for Waldorf to have presented testimony about future earnings based on attorney’s salary
  • holding that counsel 21 may not request any specific dollar amount for pain and suffering
  • holding that objection, because sufficiently specific, had preserved error alleged on appeal
  • trial court’s decision to include supplemental note on liability in the verdict form was not an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Scirica, Stapleton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Waldorf v. Shuta

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.