Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 6/22/2021

Curtis Hamrick v. Partsfleet, LLC

Citations

  • 1 F.4th 1337

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 16(a)(1)(B) does not permit an im- mediate appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitra- tion that is based on state law
  • remanding for the district court to consider whether last-mile delivery workers qualify for the exclusion
  • remanding for the district court to consider whether last-mile delivery workers qualify for the exclusion
  • remanding to consider whether final-mile delivery workers “are in a class of workers employed in the transportation industry that actually engages in foreign or interstate commerce”
  • remanding to consider whether final-mile delivery workers “are in a class of workers employed in the transportation industry 20 that actually engages in foreign or interstate commerce”
  • remanding for the district court to apply the proper test to determine whether the § 1 exemption applied to “drivers who make local deliveries of goods and materials that have been shipped from out-of-state to a local warehouse”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.