Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/9/2017
Curry v. Curry
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8127
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing marital property and ordering spousal support where the court first considered all relevant statutory factors such as the 15-year age difference between the parties, appellee's need to save for retirement, and the allocation of debt to appellee.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rigby v. RigbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-01· cited 9×
- MacKnight v. MacKnightOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-07· cited 7×
- Folberth v. FolberthOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-26· cited 2×
- Konrad v. KonradOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-22· cited 2×
- Evans v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-24· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.