Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 12/13/2002

Cunningham v. Gates

Citations

  • 312 F.3d 1148
  • 2002 WL 31780177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiff’s claims are barred “if they are 19 based on theories that ‘necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction[s] or sentence[s]” (quoting 20 Heck, 512 U.S. at 487)
  • stating that “failure [to timely] pursue [federal] habeas remedies” does not protect against Heck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, McKeown, Rymer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.