Ninth Circuit· 12/13/2002
Cunningham v. Gates
Citations
- 312 F.3d 1148
- 2002 WL 31780177
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiff’s claims are barred “if they are 19 based on theories that ‘necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction[s] or sentence[s]” (quoting 20 Heck, 512 U.S. at 487)
- stating that “failure [to timely] pursue [federal] habeas remedies” does not protect against Heck
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, McKeown, Rymer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. City of HemetNinth Circuit· 2005-01-10· cited 652×
- Narvis G. Nonnette v. Larry Small R. Schelke E. Castro D. Johnson M.A. Corbin J. BuiltmanNinth Circuit· 2002-12-26· cited 194×
- Kristy Beets v. County of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2012-02-10· cited 133×
- Thore v. HoweFirst Circuit· 2006-10-27· cited 96×
- Simpson v. ThomasNinth Circuit· 2008-06-11· cited 56×
- Irwin v. MascottNinth Circuit· 2004-06-04· cited 39×
- Cunningham v. GatesNinth Circuit· 2003-01-14· cited 24×
- Hubbs v. County of San Bernardino, CAC.D. California· 2008-02-07· cited 13×
- Truong v. Orange County Sheriff's DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-05-10· cited 10×
- Dible v. SchollN.D. Iowa· 2006-01-24· cited 7×
- Muhammad v. GarrettE.D. California· 2014-12-11· cited 5×
- Rhead v. MundyNinth Circuit· 2003-08-01· cited 1×
- Bell v. City of BoiseD. Idaho· 2014-01-27· cited 1×
- Smith v. City of HemetNinth Circuit· 2004-01-29
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2006-03-27
- Ashley v. SuttonD. Oregon· 2007-06-26
- Conner v. RambergNinth Circuit· 2004-02-24
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 15,294×
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court· 1998-03-03· cited 3,515×
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-09-06· cited 733×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. EpsteinSupreme Court· 1996-02-27· cited 497×
- Cunningham v. GatesNinth Circuit· 2000-10-31· cited 431×
- Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court· 1978-12-19· cited 420×
- Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-08-30· cited 343×
- John Wesley SMITHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert TOWERY; John A. Knight; Scott McGregor, Defendants-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1996-04-01· cited 222×
- Billington v. SmithNinth Circuit· 2002-06-21· cited 184×
- Allen v. MuskogeeTenth Circuit· 1997-07-17· cited 178×
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-01-14· cited 126×
- Robi v. ReedNinth Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 75×
- United States v. Geophysical Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1984-05-02· cited 73×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. DavisNinth Circuit· 1993-10-12· cited 31×
- Hernandez v. City Of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 1980-08-06· cited 16×
- United States v. James CarbullidoNinth Circuit· 2002-10-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.