Kentucky Supreme Court· 10/20/2016
Cunningham v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 501 S.W.3d 414
- 2016 Ky. LEXIS 503
- 2016 WL 6125686
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] trial court has absolutely no discretion to admit irrelevant evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cunningham, Hughes, Keller, Minton, Noble, Venters, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,359×
- Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court· 1991-09-26· cited 794×
- State v. BlakeWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1996-10-11· cited 73×
- Love v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2001-02-22· cited 69×
- Stephenson v. WoodwardKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-01-19· cited 66×
- Daugherty v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 28×
- Trigg v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2015-05-14· cited 22×
- Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Insurance Company's Receiver v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1926-11-12· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. BufordKentucky Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 19×
- Taylor v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-03-23· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.