Court of Appeals of Arizona· 12/15/1994
Cummings v. Cummings
Citations
- 897 P.2d 685
- 182 Ariz. 383
- 179 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 63
- 1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that gross income includes gifts where child support guidelines included gifts in definition of gross income
- holding that trial court did not err in “consider[ing] the money the grandparents regularly and voluntarily gave their daughter” in determining her income for child support purposes
- affirming attribution of homeowners’ mortgage payments as income for mother living in house rent-free
- affirming attribution of mortgage payments as income for mother living in a house rent-free
- noting courts may consider recurring cash gifts as income to a parent
- interpreting the 1992 Guidelines which also used the Income Shares Model
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kleinschmidt, Garbarino, Noyes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Sherman v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-11-01· cited 45×
- Milinovich v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-26· cited 41×
- Styka v. StykaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-11-19· cited 38×
- In Re the Marriage of Pearson v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-16· cited 29×
- Hamblen v. HamblenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-26· cited 27×
- Strait v. StraitCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-02-11· cited 25×
- In Re the Marriage of AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-12-20· cited 8×
- A.N. ex rel. S.N. v. S.M.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-08-01· cited 5×
- An Ex Rel. SN v. SMNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-08-01
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-05-21
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Marriage of BergerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-06· cited 77×
- Margolin v. MargolinMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-08-07· cited 35×
- Bruguier v. BruguierNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-03-19· cited 24×
- Spector v. SpectorCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-05-04· cited 22×
- Brevick v. BrevickCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-04-29· cited 21×
- Schenek v. SchenekCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-09-21· cited 11×
- In Re the Marriage of PacificCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-07-18· cited 11×
- Dickens v. DickensCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-12-04· cited 10×
- Beck v. JaegerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-10· cited 10×
- Halcomb v. HalcombCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1960-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.