Cullen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because statute provided different degrees of punishment for accessory after the fact based upon severity of underlying crime, conviction required defendant charged as accessory know significant elements of crime committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sapp v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-03-13· cited 53×
• Boland v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-18· cited 13×
• Cullen v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-02· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• McNeil v. Wisconsin
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
• State v. Guthrie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-29· cited 10×
• Sapp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-22· cited 7×
• Fason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-05· cited 3×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-26· cited 2×