Skip to main content
· 1/17/1979

Culinary Workers & Bartenders Union v. Gateway Cafe, Inc.

Citations

  • 588 P.2d 1334
  • 91 Wash. 2d 353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ppellants had counsel and through counsel proposed the challenged agreement. In light of this, their claim of duress lacks merit.”
  • promise to perform obligations for the benefit of third parties constitutes valid consideration to support a contract
  • pension and welfare benefit promises enforced for employees as third-party beneficiaries
  • pension and welfare benefit promises enforced for employees as third-party beneficiaries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.