Skip to main content

Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.

Citations

  • 539 A.2d 792
  • 517 Pa. 553
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the [WCAB] may only grant a rehearing where there is ‘after[-]discovered, noncumulative evidence [that] could not have been, by the exercise of ordinary diligence, produced at the original hearing’”
  • although holding that Board had broad discretion in granting a petition for a rehearing, Supreme Court recognized that the petition must be filed within eighteen months after the Board’s original decision under Section 426
  • concerning the Board's power to grant a rehearing
  • discussing power of Board to grant rehearing
  • concerning the Board’s power to grant a rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.