Skip to main content
· 3/26/1991

Rice v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Citations

  • 588 A.2d 1011
  • 138 Pa. Commw. 555
  • 1991 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where Board denied petition for rehearing but summarily addressed the merits of the claimant’s arguments without a detailed analysis of why the arguments had no merit, the statement addressing the merits is dictum and the matter must be remanded for further consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, Doyle, Colins, McGinley, Pellegrini, Kelley, Byer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.