CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We believe such an interpretation of [Kentucky Civil Rule] 35.02(1) is reasonable because it is consistent with the purpose assigned to [Rule] 35.01 to maintain a level playing field between the parties.”
• Kentucky’s Rule 35 counterpart “was intended . . . ‘to eliminate uncertainty concerning the medical aspects of the cause and permit the preparation of an intelligent and informed defense.’” (quoting State v. Seier, 567 S.W.2d 127, 128 (Mo. 1978)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aubri Vahai v. Ryan Gertsch
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2020-01-15· cited 11×
• Kelly v. Hon blanchard/goings
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-04-27· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hoskins v. Maricle
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2004-12-16· cited 335×
• Bender v. Eaton
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1961-03-03· cited 264×
• Sexton v. Bates
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2001-03-23· cited 23×
• Newsome by and Through Newsome v. Lowe
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1985-07-05· cited 22×
• State Ex Rel. McCloud v. Seier
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1978-06-15· cited 21×
• Alliant Hospitals, Inc. v. Benham
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2003-05-02· cited 17×
• Morrow v. Stivers
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1992-01-24· cited 10×
• State ex rel. Castillo v. Clark
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1994-08-15· cited 7×
• Coates v. AC & S, Inc.
  E.D. Louisiana· 1990-11-27· cited 5×
• Queen of Angels Hospital v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-04-19· cited 1×