Skip to main content

Crow v. Crow

Citations

  • 414 P.2d 82
  • 49 Haw. 258
  • 1966 Haw. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to prohibit a party from calling corroborating witnesses in a motion to reopen where the court limited the hearing to “matters set forth in the affidavit supporting the motion to reopen” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis, Mizuha, Kitaoka

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.