California Supreme Court· 11/30/1956
Crogan v. Metz
Citations
- 47 Cal. 2d 398
- 303 P.2d 1029
- 1956 Cal. LEXIS 289
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding punitive damages are not available for breach of contract under California law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shenk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court· 1994-03-31· cited 564×
- Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-08-07· cited 412×
- Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-03-12· cited 340×
- Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 165×
- Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1993-02-24· cited 164×
- Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Marina View Heights Development Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-01-20· cited 159×
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1984-04-23· cited 141×
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal· 1963-12-06· cited 118×
- Ledingham v. Blue Cross Plan for Hospital Care of Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-06-12· cited 113×
- Tavaglione v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 92×
- Dryden v. Tri-Valley GrowersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-01-18· cited 72×
- Miller v. National American Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-01-14· cited 71×
- Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1966-04-05· cited 52×
- Walker v. Signal Companies, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1978-09-20· cited 50×
- Frazier v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1985-06-10· cited 45×
- Harland v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-11-29· cited 41×
- Palmer v. Ted Stevens Honda, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1987-07-10· cited 41×
- Contractor's Safety Ass'n v. California Compensation InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-01· cited 40×
- Hofmayer v. Dean Witter & Co., Inc.N.D. California· 1978-10-18· cited 40×
- Flournoy v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-08-25· cited 38×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-12-28· cited 247×
- Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-08-11· cited 198×
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-10-01· cited 186×
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-04-30· cited 180×
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-02-25· cited 155×
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-10-01· cited 137×
- Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-08-30· cited 89×
- Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-09-28· cited 82×
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-08-11· cited 79×
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-10-01· cited 76×
- Mother Cobb's Chicken Turnovers, Inc. v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-11-26· cited 43×
- Beatty v. Pacific States Savings and Loan Co.California Court of Appeal· 1935-02-21· cited 31×
- Thompson v. StoakesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-08-04· cited 29×
- Savage v. MayerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-03-04· cited 27×
- Wallace Ranch Water Co. v. Foothill Ditch Co.California Supreme Court· 1935-12-31· cited 26×
- Kinert v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-10-17· cited 25×
- Baird v. OcequedaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-05-13· cited 22×
- Schwarting v. ArtelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-08-19· cited 21×
- Block v. D. W. Nicholson Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1947-01-22· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.