Miller v. National American Life Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the scheme itself may be probative circumstantial evidence of an intent to defraud”
• explaining that intent not to perform may be inferred from subsequent conduct
• the refusal to follow through on a promise gives rise to a permissible inference of fraud
• construing the California punitive damages statute
• construing the California punitive damages statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).