Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 11 does not “penalize[] overstatement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 6,250×
• Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
• Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-02-26· cited 811×
• Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-05-25· cited 420×
• Braley v. Campbell
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-11-09· cited 364×
• Renetta M. Miera v. Dairyland Insurance Company
  Tenth Circuit· 1998-05-07· cited 123×
• Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2015-07-14· cited 114×
• Donna M. Kiefel v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc., a California Corporation, Reese Hubbard, Donna M. Kiefel v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 1969-01-06· cited 96×
• Hamilton v. Boise Cascade Express
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-03-20· cited 83×
• Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.
  N.D. California· 1979-03-06· cited 60×
• Monsanto Company v. Kamp
  District of Columbia· 1967-06-15· cited 45×
• Dreiling v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1985-07-24· cited 45×
• Vanderbilt University v. ICOS CORP.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-07· cited 33×
• Navarro-Ayala v. Hernandez-Colon
  First Circuit· 1993-08-20· cited 27×
• In Re Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. Cheese Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2011-02-04· cited 25×
• Raylon, LLC v. Complus Data Innovations, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-07· cited 24×
• Federal Deposit Insurance v. Refco Group, Ltd.
  D. Colorado· 1997-12-19· cited 19×
• US Sprint Communications Co. v. Kaczmarek
  D. Kansas· 1988-05-31· cited 3×