Connecticut Appellate Court· 11/17/1987
Creem v. Cicero
Citations
- 12 Conn. App. 607
- 533 A.2d 234
- 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 1118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘Generally, nominal damages are fixed without regard to the extent of harm done and are assessed in some trifling or trivial amount’ ”
- “[a]s a general rule, it is manifestly unjust for the jury to fail to award damages for pain and suffering when it awards special damages”
- nominal damages are generally fixed without regard to the extent of harm done and are usually assessed in a trivial amount, often only one cent or one dollar
- no error in setting aside jury's verdict for plaintiff in the amount of \$00\ and ordering a new trial unless defendant filed additur for nominal damages of $100.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-15· cited 106×
- Jeffries v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-05-05· cited 30×
- Trumpold v. BeschConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-06-15· cited 23×
- Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2010-05-07· cited 20×
- Marchetti v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-03-26· cited 20×
- Musorofiti v. VlcekConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-28· cited 20×
- Connecticut National Bank v. D'OnofrioConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-08-19· cited 18×
- Childs v. BainerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-08-02· cited 14×
- Brennan v. ManlapazConnecticut Appellate Court· 1989-07-11· cited 12×
- Geryk v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1989-09-05· cited 10×
- Gladu v. SousaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-20· cited 10×
- Rogers v. DelfinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-03-29· cited 9×
- Fazio v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-05-03· cited 9×
- McKee v. EriksonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1995-03-07· cited 9×
- Brown v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-29· cited 8×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1957-12-03· cited 144×
- Birgel v. HeintzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-04-19· cited 129×
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-04-20· cited 119×
- Harry A. Finman & Son, Inc. v. Connecticut Truck & Trailer Service Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-08-26· cited 69×
- Zarrelli v. Barnum Festival Society, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-02-25· cited 49×
- Bambus v. Bridgeport Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-03-14· cited 35×
- Dimmock v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-07-09· cited 32×
- Hearl v. WATERBURY YMCASupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-05-04· cited 26×
- Shea v. PaczowskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-09· cited 22×
- Hammarlund v. TroianoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1959-06-03· cited 14×
- Goodman v. Metallic Ladder Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-27· cited 9×
- Buden v. DombrouskasSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-11-22· cited 9×
- Gerrety Co. v. PalmieriConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-09· cited 9×
- Malmberg v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-09-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.