Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals of Arizona· 10/21/1996

Creach v. Angulo

Citations

  • 925 P.2d 689
  • 186 Ariz. 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A court’s statement on a question not necessarily involved in the case before it is dictum.”
  • court’s statement on question not involved in case before it is dictum and not binding precedent
  • “A court‟s statement on a question not necessarily involved in the case before it is dictum.”
  • “the error must have been prejudicial to the substantial rights 3 BROWN/MARISCAL v. ZOLEY et al. Decision of the Court of the party”
  • “Dictum is not binding precedent because, inter alia, it is without the force of adjudication and the court may not have been fully advised on the question.”
  • Division One of this court, declining to follow dictum in Arizona Supreme Court opinion, stating: “Dictum is not binding precedent because, inter alia, it is without the force of adjudication and the court may not have been fully advised on the question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGREGOR, Sult, Toci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.