Skip to main content
· 11/30/1981

Town of Chino Valley v. City of Prescott

Citations

  • 638 P.2d 1324
  • 131 Ariz. 78
  • 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that amici curiae may not create, extend, or enlarge the issues
  • defining dictum as \a court's statement on a question not necessarily involved in the case\
  • dictum “is a court’s statement on a question not necessarily involved in the case and, hence, is without force of adjudication” and “not controlling as precedent”
  • “Dictum ... is a court’s statement on a question not necessarily involved in the case and, hence, is without force of adjudication.”
  • because dicta is court’s statement on question not necessarily involved in case, it is not controlling as precedent
  • “[T]here is no right of ownership of groundwater in Arizona prior to its capture and withdrawal from the common supply . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Birdsall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.