Crazy Horse, Inc. v. Pearce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a liquor license is a privilege and not a right, but also holding that the licensing procedure cannot be administered arbitrarily.
• \a liquor license is a privilege and not a property right\
• “a liquor license is a privilege and not a property right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. Apokedak
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-02-05· cited 98×
• State v. Stuart
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-02-20· cited 80×
• State Ex Rel. Richardson v. Pierandozzi
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1989-12-19· cited 16×
• Jordan v. City of Centerville
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-11-10· cited 9×
• Uptick Corp. v. Ahlin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 7×
• Fuchs v. State, Department of Idaho State Police, Bureau of Alcohol Beverage Control
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2012-02-28· cited 6×
• E & J Lounge Operating Co. v. Liquor Commission of Honolulu
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-12-24· cited 4×
• Adams v. Department of Law Enforcement
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weller v. Hopper
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1963-03-11· cited 34×
• State v. Cantrell
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-04-04· cited 31×
• Ware v. Idaho State Tax Commission
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1977-07-11· cited 28×
• Nampa Lodge No. 1389 of Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of United States v. Smylie
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1951-04-02· cited 21×
• Bilbao v. Krettinger
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1966-06-16· cited 18×
• Gartland v. Talbott
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1951-11-20· cited 18×
• Pern v. Stocks
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1970-11-17· cited 10×
• State v. Meyers
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1962-12-04· cited 10×