Bilbao v. Krettinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the parol evidence rule “not pertinent to the present issue” because “[a] contract may be clear and unambiguous as far as it goes, and yet may not express the true agreement of the parties, by reason of mutual mistake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).