Bilbao v. Krettinger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the parol evidence rule “not pertinent to the present issue” because “[a] contract may be clear and unambiguous as far as it goes, and yet may not express the true agreement of the parties, by reason of mutual mistake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hughes v. George B. Fisher, LLC
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2006-01-27· cited 46×
• Brown v. Greenheart
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-09-19· cited 23×
• Collins v. Parkinson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-09-05· cited 22×
• Foremost Insurance v. Putzier
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1980-02-21· cited 21×
• Winther v. Village of Weippe
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-07-31· cited 17×
• Crazy Horse, Inc. v. Pearce
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1977-12-22· cited 14×
• Ed Sparks & Sons v. Joe Campbell Construction Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-05-08· cited 13×
• Uptick Corp. v. Ahlin
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 7×
• Duenke v. Brummett
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-01-03· cited 7×
• Christian v. All Persons Claiming Any Right, Title or Interest in All Properties Known & Described As: All Properties Known as Newfound Bay
  Virgin Islands· 2001-06-05· cited 4×
• State v. Castro
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2008-06-23· cited 4×
• Jay Brown v. Auga Greenheart
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-09-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Thorsteinson v. Waters
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-02-25· cited 24×
• Weatherford v. WEATHERFORD
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1953-05-20· cited 19×
• Essington v. Buchele
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1962-05-17· cited 18×
• Burlington Savings Bank v. Rafoul
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1965-02-02· cited 13×
• Exum v. Portneuf-Marsh Valley Irrigation Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1923-11-03· cited 12×
• Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. Cameron
  Tenth Circuit· 1960-08-18· cited 9×
• Savings Investment & Trust Co. v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-12-17· cited 5×
• General Discount Corporation v. Sadowski
  Sixth Circuit· 1950-06-02· cited 2×
• Meyers v. Meyers
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1963-11-22· cited 1×