Crawford v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether a claimant has stated a claim for an omitted condition is a question of fact
• “Under our interpretation of the statutes, claimant’s omitted condition claim was made pursuant to both ORS 656.262(6)(d) and ORS 656.267 and triggered SAIF’s obli- gation to respond under ORS 656.262(7)(a).” (Emphasis in original.)
• describing processing requirements for new/omitted medical conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).