· 12/14/2011
SAIF Corp. v. Stephens
Citations
- 269 P.3d 62
- 247 Or. App. 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \coccydynia\ was not a new or omitted condition but a symptom encompassed within an original acceptance and that the board therefore erred in ordering its acceptance of the new/omitted condition claim and awarding attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1)
- noting our approval of that definition of “condition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.