Skip to main content
· 12/14/2011

SAIF Corp. v. Stephens

Citations

  • 269 P.3d 62
  • 247 Or. App. 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \coccydynia\ was not a new or omitted condition but a symptom encompassed within an original acceptance and that the board therefore erred in ordering its acceptance of the new/omitted condition claim and awarding attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1)
  • noting our approval of that definition of “condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.