Skip to main content

Cox v. State

Citations

  • 554 N.W.2d 712
  • 1996 Iowa App. LEXIS 90
  • 1996 WL 599313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim that trial counsel “was ineffective in failing to call an expert to rebut the statement of the State’s expert” where the applicant “presented no independent evidence to establish a contrary expert opinion would exist”
  • “At the postconviction hearing, Cox presented no independent evidence to establish a contrary expert opinion would exist. Absent such proof, he cannot 10 prove prejudice.”
  • “A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Habhab, Huitink, Sackett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.