Indiana Court of Appeals· 10/31/1991
Cox v. Cox
Citations
- 580 N.E.2d 344
- 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1779
- 1991 WL 225609
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- father’s $300,000 line of credit which he used for personal expenses as well as his farming operation afforded him great economic flexibility and was properly considered in determining his financial condition
- no error occurs when a finding of fact is consistent with a party’s stipulation
- father's $300,000 line of credit which he used for personal expenses as well as his farming operation afforded him great economic flexibility and was properly considered in determining his financial condition
- “[T]he court’s determination was limited by the nature of the evidence before it. In such circumstances, an expectation of mathematical precision by the reviewing court would be an exercise in futility and we will not so indulge ourselves.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman, Shields, Rucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thompson v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-07-15· cited 139×
- Joe v. LebowIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 61×
- Clark v. MaddenIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-10· cited 50×
- McGinley-Ellis v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-08-16· cited 47×
- In Re Marriage of BaumgartnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-30· cited 33×
- Garrod v. GarrodIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-04-15· cited 21×
- Marmaduke v. MarmadukeIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-29· cited 14×
- McGinley-Ellis v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-10-19· cited 13×
- Marriage of Lulay v. LulayIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-12-24· cited 12×
- Zakrowski v. ZakrowskiIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-06-29· cited 11×
- Zakutansky v. KanzlerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-05-12· cited 7×
- Marriage of Hoskins v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-03-30· cited 6×
- Glick v. LawmasterIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-03-17· cited 6×
- Millar v. MillarIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-11-27· cited 6×
- Roebel v. KossenyansIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-02-09· cited 2×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 1987-04-30· cited 80×
- In Re the Marriage of DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-07-06· cited 79×
- In Re the Marriage of OsborneIndiana Court of Appeals· 1977-11-17· cited 46×
- Kirkman v. KirkmanIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-07-06· cited 43×
- Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-11· cited 29×
- Cornett v. CornettIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-12-01· cited 28×
- Wright v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals· 1984-12-20· cited 28×
- In Re the Marriage of BuntinIndiana Court of Appeals· 1986-09-09· cited 24×
- Beeson v. BeesonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-30· cited 20×
- Wittwer v. WittwerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-10-23· cited 18×
- Grammer v. GrammerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-02-21· cited 16×
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-07-28· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.