Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Kentucky
Citations
- 154 U.S. 204
- 14 S. Ct. 1087
- 38 L. Ed. 962
- 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2229
Syllabus
<p>This company was incorporated under an act of the legislature of Kentucky, approved February 17, 1846, with authority to construct a bridge across the Ohio at Cincinnati. The third section of the act required its confirmation by the State of Ohio, before the corporation should open its books for subscription; and the eighth section declared that “the president and directors shall have the rights to fix the rates of toll for passing over said bridge, and to collect the same from all and every person or persons passing thereon, with their goods, carriages, or animals of every description or kind; provided, however, that the said company shall lay before the legislature of this State a correct statement of the costs of said bridge, and an annual statement of the tolls received for passing the same, and also the cost of keeping the said bridge in repair, and of the other expenses of the company; and the said president and directors shall, from time to time, reduce the rates of toll, so that the net profits of the said bridge shall not exceed fifteen per cent per annum, after the proper'deductions are made for repairs and charges of other descriptions.” By an act of the legislature of Ohio, enacted March 9, 1849, this company was made a body corporate and politic of that State, “ with the same franchises, rights, and privileges, and subject to the same duties and liabilities,” as were specified in its original incorporation. Some .subsequent legislation took place not affecting the matter in issue here. The bridge was completed in 1867 at a cost much in excess of what had been contemplated, and- has never earned 15 per cent on its cost. On the 31st of March, 1890, the legislature of Kentucky enacted that it should be unlawful to charge, collect, demand, or receive for passage over the bridge spanning the Ohio River, constructed under such act of incorporation, any toll, fare, or compensation greater than, or in excess of, certain rates prescribed by the act, which wer
Judges: Brown, Fuller, Field, Gray, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. GuestSupreme Court· 1966-04-04· cited 721×
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court· 1913-06-09· cited 719×
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 536×
- Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1941-11-24· cited 462×
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 304×
- Covington & Lexington Turnpike Road Co. v. SandfordSupreme Court· 1896-12-14· cited 244×
- Public Utilities Commission v. Attleboro Steam & Electric Co.Supreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 225×
- Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MealeySupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 172×
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. JamesSupreme Court· 1896-05-04· cited 160×
- Austin v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1900-12-03· cited 156×
- Hanley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1903-01-12· cited 147×
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. NebraskaSupreme Court· 1896-11-30· cited 135×
- Southern Railway Co. v. ReidSupreme Court· 1912-01-09· cited 134×
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court· 1899-04-03· cited 113×
- Southern Pac. Co. v. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan, Attorney General of ArizonaSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 95×
- Henderson Bridge Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1897-03-15· cited 86×
- Charles F. Champion, Appt. v. John C. Ames, United States MarshalSupreme Court· 1901-10-17· cited 81×
- Port Richmond & Bergen Point Ferry Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court· 1914-06-08· cited 62×
- South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. City of CovingtonSupreme Court· 1915-01-05· cited 54×
- Klein v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1928-05-22· cited 52×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court· 1824-03-18· cited 2,543×
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1877-03-18· cited 1,474×
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court· 1819-02-22· cited 668×
- The LottawannaSupreme Court· 1875-05-18· cited 433×
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1885-03-30· cited 339×
- WILLSON AND OTHERS v. the Black Bird Creek Marsh CompanySupreme Court· 1829-03-20· cited 294×
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1888-03-19· cited 290×
- Brown v. HoustonSupreme Court· 1885-05-04· cited 286×
- Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court· 1878-01-14· cited 236×
- License Tax CasesSupreme Court· 1867-01-28· cited 219×
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1886-11-01· cited 197×
- Escanaba Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 196×
- Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of HealthSupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 159×
- Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. IowaSupreme Court· 1877-03-18· cited 146×
- Transportation Co. v. ParkersburgSupreme Court· 1883-04-30· cited 112×
- Peik v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1877-03-18· cited 105×
- Huse v. GloverSupreme Court· 1886-12-20· cited 99×
- Pound v. TurckSupreme Court· 1878-01-18· cited 95×
- Cardwell v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court· 1885-01-19· cited 90×
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. East St. LouisSupreme Court· 1883-03-18· cited 88×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.