Skip to main content
· 3/18/1883

Escanaba Co. v. Chicago

Citations

  • 107 U.S. 678
  • 2 S. Ct. 185
  • 27 L. Ed. 442
  • 1882 U.S. LEXIS 1266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that whatever restriction may have been imposed over Illinois' ability to regulate the operation of bridges over the Chicago River, such restrictions disappeared once Illinois was admitted into the Union as a state
  • describing a suit as “brought for damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Field

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.