Skip to main content
· 10/11/2011

Councell v. Homer Laughlin China Co.

Citations

  • 823 F. Supp. 2d 370
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117065
  • 2011 WL 4808192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that while the plaintiffs “plead the broad tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress, such a broad pleading of this intentional tort is insufficient to plead deliberate intention to cause injury”
  • granting motion to dismiss intentional infliction of emotional distress claim on similar grounds
  • “[I]f diversity jurisdiction exists and a defendant removes a case in violation of the forum defendant rule ..., the plaintiff may still exercise control over the case by moving for remand.”
  • “[I]f diversity jurisdiction exists and a defendant removes a case in violation of the forum defendant rule ..., the plaintiff may still exercise control over the case by moving for remand.”
  • “[I]f diversity jurisdiction exists and a defendant removes a case in violation of the forum defendant rule . . . , the plaintiff may still exercise control over the case by moving for remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.