Skip to main content

Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.

Citations

  • 48 Conn. App. 618
  • 711 A.2d 1180
  • 13 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1732
  • 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the claim because the plaintiff’s “actions and expressions of opinion did interfere with his relationship with his employer”
  • “In deciding whether the allegations of the plaintiff's complaint [under § 31–51q] state a cause of action for the deprivation of a constitutionally protected right, it is instructive to review federal and state cases arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because § 31–51q is analogous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dupont, Hennessy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.