Schumann v. Dianon Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the rule in Garcetti v. Ceballos, supra, 547 U.S. 410, applies to claims under § 31-51q grounded in the first amendment that are brought against private employers”
• assuming, without deciding, that balancing test for determining whether public employee speech was constitu- tionally protected was applicable before concluding that plaintiff could not prevail under that test
• identifying federal circuit courts that fol- lowed dicta from United States Supreme Court case
• ‘‘it is well established that a . . . government may not compel individuals to relin- quish their first amendment rights as a condition to obtaining government employment’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).