Cote v. Cote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming anti-harassment injunction issued by divorce court under its equitable powers, and not under civil protection order statute
• affirming anti-harassment injunction issued by divorce court under its equitable powers, and not under civil protection order statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Choate v. Choate
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-09-02· cited 15×
• Sieglein v. Schmidt
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-08-25· cited 14×
• Burwell v. Burwell
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-09-04· cited 13×
• Sieglein v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-05-20· cited 9×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fuentes v. Shevin
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
• Pitsenberger v. Pitsenberger
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-06· cited 96×
• Magness v. Magness
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-09· cited 10×