Fourth Circuit· 6/21/2004
CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.
Citations
- 373 F.3d 544
- 2004 WL 1375732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an ISP who owns an electronic facility that responds automatically to users’ input is not a direct infringer”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Michael, Gregory
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-03· cited 333×
- Davis v. BligeSecond Circuit· 2007-10-05· cited 154×
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLCNinth Circuit· 2007-05-31· cited 106×
- Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. CSC Holdings, Inc.Second Circuit· 2008-08-04· cited 94×
- Arista Records LLC v. Usenet. Com, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-06-30· cited 50×
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-05-16· cited 46×
- CoStar Realty Information, Inc. v. FieldD. Maryland· 2009-03-31· cited 45×
- In Re OotN.D. Ohio· 2007-03-19· cited 34×
- Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc.S.D. New York· 2013-03-30· cited 31×
- Parker v. Google, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-03-10· cited 28×
- J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mayrealii, LLCD. Maryland· 2012-02-01· cited 26×
- Field v. Google Inc.D. Nevada· 2006-01-19· cited 25×
- Io Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks, Inc.N.D. California· 2008-08-27· cited 21×
- BWP Media U.S. Inc. v. Polyvore, Inc.Second Circuit· 2019-04-17· cited 20×
- Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-02· cited 19×
- Wood v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co.D. Colorado· 2008-12-15· cited 17×
- Shell v. American Family Rights Ass'nD. Colorado· 2012-09-28· cited 17×
- In Re ThomasD. South Carolina· 2006-06-27· cited 16×
- Newborn v. Yahoo!, Inc.District of Columbia· 2005-09-27· cited 16×
- In Re MarkD. Maryland· 2006-01-23· cited 11×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court· 1991-03-27· cited 2,678×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 1,191×
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 978×
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court· 1986-03-24· cited 763×
- Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court· 1979-06-27· cited 424×
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1993-04-07· cited 349×
- Ellison v. RobertsonNinth Circuit· 2004-02-10· cited 337×
- Gershwin Publishing Corporation v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., and Community Concerts, Inc.Second Circuit· 1971-05-24· cited 305×
- John Doe and Other Members of the Football Team at Illinois State University v. Gte Corporation and Genuity Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2003-10-21· cited 145×
- Religious Technology Center v. Netcom On-Line Communication Services, Inc.N.D. California· 1995-11-21· cited 135×
- Juan R. Ortiz-Gonzalez v. Fonovisa, Juan R. Ortiz-Gonzalez v. Distribuidora Nacional De Discos, Inc.First Circuit· 2002-02-07· cited 76×
- Vault Corporation v. Quaid Software LimitedFifth Circuit· 1988-06-20· cited 73×
- Keeler Brass Company v. Continental Brass Company Everett Bryant Sales, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1988-12-07· cited 56×
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Cybernet Ventures, Inc.C.D. California· 2002-08-13· cited 53×
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. FrenaM.D. Florida· 1993-12-09· cited 37×
- Als Scan, Incorporated v. Remarq Communities, IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 2001-02-06· cited 33×
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Webbworld, Inc.N.D. Texas· 1997-12-11· cited 33×
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Russ Hardenburgh, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 1997-11-25· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.