Federal Claims· 5/10/2006

Corrigan v. United States

Citations

70 Fed. Cl. 665
2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 119
2006 WL 1283539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court possessed subject matter jurisdiction over a plaintiffs claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Federal Employee Pay Act of unpaid overtime within, but not beyond, the limitations period
finding that “[t]he court need not decide whether the FLSA is subject to equitable tolling, however, because plaintiff has not pleaded facts that would entitle him to equitable tolling of the statute”
denying reconsideration “[bjecause plaintiff uses the same facts on which to base his new legal theories, he could have argued these new legal theories at the summary judgment stage”
“[B]y failing to raise an issue when it is first available to be litigated, a party waives consideration by the court of the issue on reconsideration, even when the party is pro se.”
“[B]y failing to raise an issue when it is first available to be litigated, a party waives consideration by the court of the issue on reconsideration, even when the party is pro se.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Corrigan v. United States

33 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.