E.D. Pennsylvania· 10/5/1994
Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital
Citations
- 158 F.R.D. 54
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14402
- 1994 WL 559205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying plaintiff’s motion to compel as moot where defendant stated he had no responsive documents in response to plaintiff’s requests for production
- stating general rule that “surveillance materials are discoverable, within the context of the attorney work product doctrine” but that “before any of these disclosures . . . the defense must be given an opportunity to depose the plaintiff fully as to her injuries.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joyner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Merrill v. Waffle House, Inc.N.D. Texas· 2005-03-22· cited 65×
- United States Ex Rel. Shamesh v. CA, Inc.District of Columbia· 2016-01-06· cited 37×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2000-05-10· cited 22×
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-10-21· cited 22×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2000-06-05· cited 19×
- Furniture World, Inc. v. D.A.V. Thrift Stores, Inc.D. New Mexico· 1996-06-04· cited 18×
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2000-03-29· cited 16×
- Gibson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-02-10· cited 14×
- Teichgraeber v. Memorial Union Corp.D. Kansas· 1996-07-09· cited 11×
- Barron v. Caterpillar, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-06-20· cited 10×
- Smith v. Transducer Technology, Inc.Virgin Islands· 2000-07-19· cited 7×
- Melhorn v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-04-03· cited 6×
- Joan Mernick and John Mernick v. Wanda McCutchen and HudsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2015-09-03· cited 4×
- Queen's University v. Kinedyne Corp.D. Kansas· 1995-05-01· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-10-29
- Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of IraqDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-18
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-03-04· cited 193×
- Snead v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-03-28· cited 59×
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1979-12-12· cited 43×
- Fisher v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.S.D. Indiana· 1993-12-02· cited 42×
- Stabilus v. Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & GreavesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-10-01· cited 29×
- Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.N.D. Indiana· 1991-07-15· cited 17×
- Blyther v. Northern Lines, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-10-01· cited 9×
- Continental Access Control Systems, Inc. v. Racal-Vikonics, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-12-28· cited 7×
Other cases named Corrigan v. Methodist Hospital
10 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-01-11· cited 11×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-11-01· cited 10×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-07-11· cited 7×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-12-06· cited 6×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-05-08· cited 5×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-12-06· cited 5×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-05-11· cited 5×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 2002-11-06· cited 5×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-01-11· cited 4×
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalE.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-12-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.