Cornish v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] motion for reconsideration is not an opportunity to relitigate claims previously decided and is not a vehicle for presenting theories or arguments that could have been raised previously.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (No. Ii)- Mdl No. 2925
  District of Columbia· 2021-05-12

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 1,413×
• Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. Firestone
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
• Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-Appellees
  D.C. Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 272×
• Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, Margaret
  D.C. Circuit· 1998-07-24· cited 224×
• Niedermeier v. Office of Baucus
  District of Columbia· 2001-07-24· cited 216×
• Lightfoot v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2005-01-28· cited 51×
• Kittner v. Gates
  District of Columbia· 2011-05-11· cited 28×
• Cornish v. Dudas
  District of Columbia· 2010-06-04· cited 27×
• Wright v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  District of Columbia· 2009-02-24· cited 21×
• Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  District of Columbia· 2012-04-30· cited 21×
• Roane v. Gonzales
  District of Columbia· 2011-12-29· cited 20×
• Fund for Animals v. Williams
  District of Columbia· 2004-02-03· cited 19×
• Cornish v. United States of America
  District of Columbia· 2012-08-15· cited 16×
• Cornish v. Dudas
  District of Columbia· 2011-09-27· cited 14×
• Cornish v. Kappos
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-13· cited 2×