Cordle v. Guarino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that ignorance of filing deadlines does not excuse untimely filing even by pro se prisoners
• noting that ignorance of filing deadlines does not excuse untimely filing even by pro se prisoners
• noting that “Section 2244(d)(2) only stops, but does not reset, the [AEDPA] clock from ticking and cannot revive a time period that has already expired.” (alternations in original) (citation omitted)
• “Section 2244(d)(2) only stops, but does not reset, the [AEDPA] clock from ticking and cannot revive a time period that has already expired”
• Section 2244(d)(2) cannot revive a time period that has already expired
• Section 2244(d)(2) cannot revive a time period that has already expired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).