First Circuit· 2/5/2003

David v. Hall

Citations

318 F.3d 343
2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1961
2003 WL 245318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that AEDPA §2244(b)(2)(B)(ii) is an example of Congress providing extra protection for claims of actual innocence
noting that Congress did adopt a form of “actual innocence” test with regard to the statutory provisions governing the filing of second or successive petitions
stating that it is not our place to “engraft an additional judge-made exception onto congressional language that is clear on its face”
explaining that AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations “is not even arguably unconstitutional” as applied to petitioner who “had ample time . . . in which to bring his claim within the statutory deadline”
expressing skepticism as to whether a habeas petitioner’s actual innocence can override the AEDPA’s limitations period
rejecting the contention that applying AEDPA’s statute of limitations period to persons who claim “actual innocence” amounts to a suspension of the writ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named David v. Hall

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.