Skip to main content
· 6/2/2006

Cordero-Hernandez v. Hernandez-Ballestero

Citations

  • 449 F.3d 240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that facts alleged did 37 not suggest that limited discovery would uncover interstate wire communications when all parties were based in same state at all relevant times

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.