Cordance Corp. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a patentee’s interrogatory answer, stating that the products were marked with the relevant patent numbers, “may very well have let it avoid summary judgment” if the defendant had moved for summary judgment on the marking issue
• considering a companies’ financial resources and size when determining whether the alleged delay in prosecuting the asserted patent was reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• International Business Machines Corp. v. Priceline Group Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2017-09-18· cited 3×
• Ormco Corp. v. ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
  C.D. California· 2009-07-27· cited 1×

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 1988-12-21· cited 553×
• C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-09-30· cited 294×
• Brulotte v. Thys Co.
  Supreme Court· 1964-11-16· cited 204×
• Susan M. Maxwell v. J. Baker, Inc., and Prange Way, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-08-28· cited 164×
• American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1993-12-06· cited 134×
• Virginia Panel Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Mac Panel Company
  Federal Circuit· 1998-02-20· cited 126×
• Dunlap v. Schofield
  Supreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 117×
• Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. Alexander
  Federal Circuit· 1992-09-24· cited 114×
• Woodbridge v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1923-11-12· cited 75×
• Williams v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-09-17· cited 66×
• Bandag, Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1983-04-18· cited 45×
• In Re Stephen B. Bogese II
  Federal Circuit· 2002-09-13· cited 39×
• Sentry Protection Products, Inc. v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-03-11· cited 30×
• Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-04-03· cited 17×
• Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
  N.D. California· 2003-03-31· cited 11×
• State Contracting & Engineering Corp. v. Condotte America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2003-10-07· cited 9×
• Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
  D. Massachusetts· 2007-07-06· cited 6×
• Stambler v. RSA Security, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2003-01-14· cited 5×