Skip to main content
· 9/24/1992

Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., and Jerry A. Alexander

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 700
  • 24 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1173
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 1465
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a determination of whether the patentee's single-use restriction on its medical device was reasonable and within the scope of its patent
  • vacating injunction against infringement notices where no bad faith was alleged
  • “The principle of exhaustion of the patent right [does] not turn a conditional sale into an unconditional one.”
  • a licensing practice is “reasonably within the patent grant” if “it relates to subject matter within the scope of the patent claims”
  • “[A] restrictive license to a particular use [i]s permissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Lourie, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.