Skip to main content

Coralluzzo by and Through Coralluzzo v. Fass

Citations

  • 450 So. 2d 858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “no evidentiary rule of physician/patient confidentiality exists in Florida....”
  • \whether [a doctor] has violated the ethical standards of his profession is a matter to be addressed by the profession itself\
  • no physician-patient privilege in absence of statute
  • profession should address violation of ethical rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.