Supreme Court of Florida· 5/17/1984
Coralluzzo by and Through Coralluzzo v. Fass
Citations
- 450 So. 2d 858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “no evidentiary rule of physician/patient confidentiality exists in Florida....”
- \whether [a doctor] has violated the ethical standards of his profession is a matter to be addressed by the profession itself\
- no physician-patient privilege in absence of statute
- profession should address violation of ethical rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ehrlich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.