Huhta v. State Board of Medicine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to extend judicial immunity to administrative disciplinary proceedings before the State Board of Medicine “because it is the Board in which the Commonwealth vests its trust to ensure the competency of practicing physicians and thereby protect the public”
• “It is the Board that is charged with the responsibility of overseeing the medical profession and determining the competency and fitness of an individual to practice medicine within the Commonwealth and we decline to handicap the Board in performing this important function.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).