Skip to main content
· 4/20/1965

Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)

Citations

  • 418 Pa. 262
  • 210 A.2d 882
  • 1965 Pa. LEXIS 592

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the proper operation of Section 914 was demonstrated in Seaboard, 221 F.2d 366
  • denying § 914 relief because defendant’s tortious conduct was not the subject matter of the prior action
  • denying § 914 relief because defendant's tor-tious conduct was not the subject matter of the prior action
  • error for trial court to modify or reverse an order from which appeal has been taken
  • where appeal was discontinued after the decree challenged on appeal was improperly rescinded, fairness required that the discontinuance be deemed withdrawn so that the appeal would be timely
  • where appeal was discontinued after the decree challenged on appeal was improperly rescinded, fairness required that the discontinuance be deemed withdrawn so that the appeal would be timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.