Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/6/1984
Commonwealth v. Hall
Citations
- 476 A.2d 7
- 327 Pa. Super. 390
- 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that criminal defendant's pro se actions have no legal effect while he or she remains represented by counsel.
- rejecting pro se appeal of order denying writ of habeas corpus by counseled appellant
- appeal from order denying defendant’s pro se pre-trial motion to recuse trial judge was improperly filed due to motion’s interlocutory and unappealable nature
- appeal from order denying defendant's pro se pre-trial motion to recuse trial judge was improperly filed due to motion's interlocutory and unappealable nature
- trial court could not proceed to trial under Rule 1701(c) so long as appeal from denial of motion to recuse was pending,, .because recusal issue was too closely related to the defendant’s right to a fair trial to permit the trial to proceed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Montemuro, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CooperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-29· cited 155×
- Kenis v. Perini Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-18· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. McClureSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-10-20· cited 28×
- Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.D. New Hampshire· 1993-03-31· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. PiscanioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-18· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. MageeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-27· cited 15×
- Mumma v. Boswell, Tintner, Piccola & WickershamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-10-30· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. BurkettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-24· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-01· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Corace v. BALINT (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-04-20· cited 98×
- Martin v. SoblotneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-14· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-21· cited 39×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Posnansky v. PosnanskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-06-16· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. BorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-08-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.