Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Hall

Citations

  • 476 A.2d 7
  • 327 Pa. Super. 390
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal defendant's pro se actions have no legal effect while he or she remains represented by counsel.
  • rejecting pro se appeal of order denying writ of habeas corpus by counseled appellant
  • appeal from order denying defendant’s pro se pre-trial motion to recuse trial judge was improperly filed due to motion’s interlocutory and unappealable nature
  • appeal from order denying defendant's pro se pre-trial motion to recuse trial judge was improperly filed due to motion's interlocutory and unappealable nature
  • trial court could not proceed to trial under Rule 1701(c) so long as appeal from denial of motion to recuse was pending,, .because recusal issue was too closely related to the defendant’s right to a fair trial to permit the trial to proceed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Montemuro, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.